And you cannot prove a religion is false. But you could prove evolution was false, and if you did, the theory of evolution would, *ahem* 'evolve' to take your discovery into account.
I was at GA representing the HUUmanists Association (and I was supposed to be a delegate from FPC of Stow & Acton though I forgot my delegate card at home).
I especially liked your reference to "You're a Theist, I'm a Humanist". I got linked to Humanism by reading "Good Without God". Thanks for your thoughts about Chris Stedman.
But also, "What's the solution? Encourage more rationalists to give money to organizations that counter the repressive, Fundamentalist organizations and do so myself."
I was on the local Board of Directors and also the International Audit Committee of the Nonviolent Peaceforce. They had a tag line that said, "What to say 'Yes' to when you say 'No' to war".
I agree with this statement, "if religious groups are to succeed in protecting human rights, a greater degree of dialogue and cooperation in the future is essential".
And you cannot prove a religion is false. But you could prove evolution was false, and if you did, the theory of evolution would, *ahem* 'evolve' to take your discovery into account.
Well, Religions can be shown as False One just needs to read it with an open mind not a closed mind, and would see all the falsehood in it ..
I was at GA representing the HUUmanists Association (and I was supposed to be a delegate from FPC of Stow & Acton though I forgot my delegate card at home).
I especially liked your reference to "You're a Theist, I'm a Humanist". I got linked to Humanism by reading "Good Without God". Thanks for your thoughts about Chris Stedman.
I enjoyed your story very much, David!.
But also, "What's the solution? Encourage more rationalists to give money to organizations that counter the repressive, Fundamentalist organizations and do so myself."
I agree with your mild criticism that "religion" is not a monolithic entity that can be accused of "
Hmmm... I see your point that Secular does not mean anti- or even non-religioius.
Speaking of religion-based laws, aren't laws regulating sexuality (e.g., prostitution) religiously motivated?
Free will has never been at odds with determinism, so the "Choose Determinism" image would be inappropriate.
Marvin,
I agree with this statement, "if religious groups are to succeed in protecting human rights, a greater degree of dialogue and cooperation in the future is essential".
Pages